Protocol Specs v2.4 (Active)

JuriXAI Whitepaper & Docs

Welcome to the formal specifications of the JuriXAI protocol. This guide provides builders, hosts, and judges with a transparent view into our autonomous evaluation engine, agent system prompts, and Circle USDC economic pipelines.

Overview & Vision

Traditional hackathons are plagued by subjective judging, coordination delays, and slow, manual payout mechanisms. Judges often skim repositories, favor high-production video pitches, and suffer from fatigue.

The Old Way

  • Subjective, biased human judging
  • Hours of manual grading and spreadsheet work
  • Days or weeks of waiting for prize payments
  • Opaque feedback (often just a final list of names)

The JuriXAI Way

  • Four deterministic, specialized AI agent rubrics
  • Submissions scored automatically within minutes
  • Onchain USDC distribution to winners directly
  • Fully traceable rationale and evidence flags

The Core Lifecycle

1. Hackathon Initialization

Hosts create an event, deposit a USDC prize pool via Circle, and configure judging criteria matched to the agents' specializations.

2. Builder Submission

Hackathon participants submit their project title, description, code repository (GitHub), deployment demo, and destination USDC wallet address.

3. Autonomous Agent Audit

When the deadline passes, JuriXAI spins up judging runs. The system crawls repositories, parses README directions, and invokes the 4 AI agent judges.

4. Micro-transactions & Verification

Agents are paid dynamic workload fees in USDC for computational effort. The results (scores, evidence list, flags) are committed to the database.

5. USDC Prize Disbursement

The leaderboard calculates the weighted average. The smart contracts trigger on-chain transfers to the top-scoring teams automatically.